Opinion
No. SC06-2539.
February 5, 2007.
Lower Tribunal No.: 4D06-4288.
To the extent petitioner is seeking reinstatement of Case No. 4D06-4288, in the Fourth District Court of Appeal, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied because petitioner failed to show a clear legal right to the relief requested. See Huffman v. State, 813 So.2d 10, 11 (Fla. 2000) (stating that in order to be entitled to a writ of mandamus, petitioner must show clear legal right to performance of requested act, that respondent has indisputable legal duty to perform that act, and that no other adequate remedy exists).
To the extent petitioner is seeking grant of a belated appeal of Case No. 89-925 CFA, the petition is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, QUINCE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur.