From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gordon v. Medina

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Oct 14, 2011
Civil Action No. 11-cv-01520-LTB (D. Colo. Oct. 14, 2011)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-cv-01520-LTB

10-14-2011

LARRY GORDON, Applicant, v. ANGEL MEDINA, Warden at Limon Facility, and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO, JOHN W. SUTHERS, Respondents.


ORDER DENYING LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS ON APPEAL

Babcock, Senior Judge

Applicant has submitted a Notice of Appeal. Applicant previously was allowed to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 in this court in this action. The Court has examined the file and has determined that leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal must be denied. Pursuant to Rule 24(a)(3) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, the Court finds that this appeal is not taken in good faith because applicant has not shown the existence of a reasoned, non-frivolous argument on the law and facts in support of the issues raised on appeal. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is denied because this appeal is not taken in good faith.

DATED at Denver, Colorado this 14th day of October, 2011.

BY THE COURT:

Lewis T. Babcock

SENIOR JUDGE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT

COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO


Summaries of

Gordon v. Medina

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Oct 14, 2011
Civil Action No. 11-cv-01520-LTB (D. Colo. Oct. 14, 2011)
Case details for

Gordon v. Medina

Case Details

Full title:LARRY GORDON, Applicant, v. ANGEL MEDINA, Warden at Limon Facility, and…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Oct 14, 2011

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-cv-01520-LTB (D. Colo. Oct. 14, 2011)