From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gordon v. Dadante

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Apr 19, 2007
Case No. 1:05CV2726 (N.D. Ohio Apr. 19, 2007)

Opinion

Case No. 1:05CV2726.

April 19, 2007


ORDER


Before the Court is the United States of America's (the "Government") April 12, 2007 Motion to Intervene and Partially Stay Discovery (Doc. 243). On April 13, 2007, Mark Dottore, the Receiver, filed a Response to the Government's Motion to Intervene and Partially Stay Discovery (Doc. 249).

On March 15, 2007, the Government filed a criminal complaint against David A. Dadante. Many of the issues of liability in that criminal case and the case sub judice share common underpinnings. The Government, therefore, seeks to intervene in this case and stay discovery to prevent interference with its criminal investigation. The Court finds that the Government has a compelling interest in seeing that matters otherwise not discoverable in the criminal case are not presented during the course of civil discovery.

Accordingly, the Government's Motion to Intervene is GRANTED. The Government's Motion to Partially Stay Discovery is also GRANTED as follows:

all depositions, interrogatories, discovery, and other investigative measures that are unnecessary for the Receiver's location, recovery, preservation, and distribution of the assets of IPOF, L.P., IPOF Fund, and IPOF Fund II, L.P. (the "Fund") and David Dadante are STAYED until further notice. The Court will permit the parties to conduct discovery, as necessary, into the narrow issue of the legal status of the Fund (as discussed in the Court's March 29, 2007 Order). Such discovery shall be strictly limited to the question of the Fund's legal status, and only will be permitted until the April 30, 2007 deadline for submitting position papers, after which time, such discovery will be stayed as described above. In accordance with this Order, therefore, the scope of the deposition of Steven L. Wasserman,

noticed on April 12, 2007 by Mr. Cheselka who represents certain individual plaintiffs, shall be strictly limited to the issue of the legal status of the Fund.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Gordon v. Dadante

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Apr 19, 2007
Case No. 1:05CV2726 (N.D. Ohio Apr. 19, 2007)
Case details for

Gordon v. Dadante

Case Details

Full title:SHELDON GORDON, et al., Plaintiffs, v. DAVID DADANTE et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Apr 19, 2007

Citations

Case No. 1:05CV2726 (N.D. Ohio Apr. 19, 2007)