From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gordon v. Air Liquide-Big Three Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Feb 18, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-396-SDD-RLB (M.D. La. Feb. 18, 2014)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-396-SDD-RLB CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-358-SDD-RLB

02-18-2014

CAROLYN GORDON, ET AL. v. AIR LIQUIDE-BIG THREE INC., ET AL THIS DOCUMENT PERTAINS TO: IRMA PAYNE, ET AL v. AIR LIQUIDE-BIG THREE INC., ET AL


RULING

The Court, after carefully considering the Petition, the record, the law applicable to this action, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Richard L. Bourgeois, Jr. dated January 27, 2014, to which no objection has been filed, hereby approves the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and adopts it as the Court's opinion herein.

ACCORDINGLY, Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand is denied.

Rec. Doc. 7. CV13-358

Baton Rouge, Louisiana, February 18, 2014.

__________

SHELLY D. DICK, DISTRICT JUDGE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA


Summaries of

Gordon v. Air Liquide-Big Three Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Feb 18, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-396-SDD-RLB (M.D. La. Feb. 18, 2014)
Case details for

Gordon v. Air Liquide-Big Three Inc.

Case Details

Full title:CAROLYN GORDON, ET AL. v. AIR LIQUIDE-BIG THREE INC., ET AL THIS DOCUMENT…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: Feb 18, 2014

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-396-SDD-RLB (M.D. La. Feb. 18, 2014)