From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gordon-Holden v. West Coast Collections, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 17, 2011
Case No. CV 11-5781 PA (SPx) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 17, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. CV 11-5781 PA (SPx)

11-17-2011

Jamie Gordon-Holden v. West Coast Collections, Inc.


CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Present: The Honorable PERCY ANDERSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Paul Songco

Deputy Clerk

Not Reported

Court Reporter

N/A

Tape No.

Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs:

Attorneys Present for Defendants:

Proceedings: Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal For Lack Of Prosecution

Generally, defendants must answer the complaint within 21 days after service (60 days if the defendant is the United States). Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(1).

In the present case, it appears that this time period has not been met. Accordingly, the court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff to show cause in writing on or before December 2, 2011 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the court finds that this matter is appropriate for submission without oral argument. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of plaintiff's response. Failure to respond to this Order may result in the imposition of sanctions, including but not limited to dismissal of the complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Gordon-Holden v. West Coast Collections, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 17, 2011
Case No. CV 11-5781 PA (SPx) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 17, 2011)
Case details for

Gordon-Holden v. West Coast Collections, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Jamie Gordon-Holden v. West Coast Collections, Inc.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 17, 2011

Citations

Case No. CV 11-5781 PA (SPx) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 17, 2011)