Opinion
(Filed 25 May, 1908.)
APPEAL from Justice, J., at chambers, 18 November, 1906, from RUTHERFORD, on a controversy submitted without action. The facts, exhibits, etc., are the same as in Mershon against same defendant, the only difference being that the property purchased from the plaintiff was "one No. 16 Town one-man two-saw trimmer, complete, with two saws." Judgment was rendered for plaintiff. Defendant excepted and appealed.
No counsel for plaintiff.
R. S. Eaves and J. P. Morris for defendant.
For digest, see Mershon against same defendant, next preceding.
The decision of this appeal is governed by what we have said in Mershon's case, ante 48. It is not necessary to discuss the matter further. The judgment is
Affirmed.
(54)