From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Goodyear Tire v. Moore

Court of Appeals of Virginia
Jul 12, 2005
Record No. 0639-05-3 (Va. Ct. App. Jul. 12, 2005)

Opinion

Record No. 0639-05-3.

July 12, 2005.

Appeal from the Virginia Workers' Compensation Commission.

(James A.L. Daniel; Janine M. Jacob; Daniel, Vaughan, Medley Smitherman, P.C., on brief), for appellants.

Philip B. Baker; Sanzone Baker, P.C., on brief), for appellee.

Present: Judges Benton, Humphreys and Senior Judge Overton.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication.


The Goodyear Tire Rubber Company and its insurer appeal a decision of the Workers' Compensation Commission and contend the commission erred as a matter of law in finding that Arnold J. Moore, Jr. proved the surgical implantation of his spinal cord stimulator constituted reasonable and necessary medical treatment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the decision for the reasons stated by the commission in its final opinion. See Moore v. The Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company, VWC File No. 205-85-17 (Feb. 15, 2005). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Goodyear Tire v. Moore

Court of Appeals of Virginia
Jul 12, 2005
Record No. 0639-05-3 (Va. Ct. App. Jul. 12, 2005)
Case details for

Goodyear Tire v. Moore

Case Details

Full title:THE GOODYEAR TIRE RUBBER COMPANY AND LIBERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION v…

Court:Court of Appeals of Virginia

Date published: Jul 12, 2005

Citations

Record No. 0639-05-3 (Va. Ct. App. Jul. 12, 2005)