Summary
affirming district court opinion that admission of telephonic opinion testimony did not require remand, in part because the plaintiff failed to show resulting prejudice and the First Circuit had not barred telephonic testimony and noting that "[m]inimally, the appellant does not show that he suffered any harm with respect to the telephone testimony or administrative procedures."
Summary of this case from Green v. AstrueOpinion
Case No. 10-cv-233-PB.
April 29, 2011
ORDER
After due consideration of the objection filed, I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty dated April 11, 2011.
SO ORDERED.