From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Goodwin v. Hammond

United States District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee
Mar 21, 2023
1:23-cv-1 (E.D. Tenn. Mar. 21, 2023)

Opinion

1:23-cv-1

03-21-2023

EDGAR GOODWIN, Plaintiff, v. JIM HAMMOND, et al., Defendants.


LEE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

JUDGMENT ORDER

CHARLES E. ATCHLEY, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

For the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion filed contemporaneously with this Order, Plaintiff's pro se complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 is DISMISSED pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Because the Court CERTIFIED in the Memorandum Opinion that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, should Plaintiff file a notice of appeal, he is DENIED leave to appeal in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); Fed. R. App. P. 24.

The Clerk is DIRECTED to close the file.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Goodwin v. Hammond

United States District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee
Mar 21, 2023
1:23-cv-1 (E.D. Tenn. Mar. 21, 2023)
Case details for

Goodwin v. Hammond

Case Details

Full title:EDGAR GOODWIN, Plaintiff, v. JIM HAMMOND, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee

Date published: Mar 21, 2023

Citations

1:23-cv-1 (E.D. Tenn. Mar. 21, 2023)