From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Goodwin v. Astrue

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Oct 9, 2008
CIV-07-688-R (W.D. Okla. Oct. 9, 2008)

Opinion

CIV-07-688-R.

October 9, 2008


ORDER


Before the Court is the Supplemental Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell entered September 16, 2008. Doc. No. 33. No objection to the Findings and Recommendation has been filed nor has an extension of time in which to object been sought or granted. Therefore, the Supplemental Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge [Doc. No. 33] is ADOPTED and Plaintiff's motion for attorney's fees and her supplemental motion for attorney's fees in the total amount of $9,824.80 under the EAJA are GRANTED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Goodwin v. Astrue

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Oct 9, 2008
CIV-07-688-R (W.D. Okla. Oct. 9, 2008)
Case details for

Goodwin v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:MICHELLE R. GOODWIN, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of the…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Date published: Oct 9, 2008

Citations

CIV-07-688-R (W.D. Okla. Oct. 9, 2008)