From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Goodsell v. the Mail and Express Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 1, 1927
222 App. Div. 772 (N.Y. App. Div. 1927)

Opinion

December, 1927


Judgment reversed upon the law and a new trial granted, costs to appellant to abide the event. While we are of opinion that the published article was a fairly accurate report of the proceedings in the Magistrate's Court, privileged under the provisions of section 337 of the Civil Practice Act, we think it cannot be said as matter of law that the head lines of the article, read in connection therewith, are not libelous. This was for the jury. Young, Rich, Kapper and Hagarty, JJ., concur; Seeger, J., dissents.


Summaries of

Goodsell v. the Mail and Express Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 1, 1927
222 App. Div. 772 (N.Y. App. Div. 1927)
Case details for

Goodsell v. the Mail and Express Company

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD L. GOODSELL, Appellant, v. THE MAIL AND EXPRESS COMPANY, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 1, 1927

Citations

222 App. Div. 772 (N.Y. App. Div. 1927)

Citing Cases

MORHOUS v. PLATTSBURGH PUB. CO.

This makes a question for the jury, and the complaint cannot be held bad as matter of law." See, also,…

Morhous v. Plattsburgh Pub. Co.

This makes a question for the jury, and the complaint cannot be held bad as matter of law." See, also,…