Opinion
[No. 21, October Term, 1950.]
Decided December 6, 1950.
Habeas Corpus — If Second Application for Leave To Appeal Contains No New Allegations Worthy Of Note. It Will Be Denied.
If a second application for leave to appeal a habeas corpus case contains no new allegations worthy of note, it will be denied. p. 638
Decided December 6, 1950.
Habeas corpus proceeding by Richard Goodman against Warden of Maryland Penitentiary. From a refusal of the writ, petitioner applied for leave to appeal.
Application denied.
Before MARBURY, C.J., and DELAPLAINE, COLLINS, GRASON, HENDERSON and MARKELL, JJ.
This is an application for leave to appeal from a refusal of a writ of habeas corpus. The applicant was convicted of murder in the first degree and sentenced to life imprisonment in 1945. This is his second application for appeal. 190 Md. 746, 60 A.2d 527; certiorari denied Goodman v. Swenson, 335 U.S. 847, 69 S.Ct. 58, 93 L.Ed. 397; Id., 337 U.S. 933, 69 S.Ct. 1488, 93 L.Ed. 1740. The present application is only a rehash of his previous contentions, and contains no new allegations worthy of note.
Application denied, with costs.