From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Goodman v. Neven

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Mar 15, 2013
2:12-CV-01967-JCM-VCF (D. Nev. Mar. 15, 2013)

Opinion

2:12-CV-01967-JCM-VCF

03-15-2013

RALPH EUGENE GOODMAN, Petitioner, v. D.W. NEVEN, et al., Respondents.


ORDER

Petitioner Ralph Eugene Goodman has submitted a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (ECF #1-1) and has now paid the filing fee (see ECF #4).

Petitioner has filed a motion for appointment of counsel (ECF #2). There is no constitutional right to appointed counsel for a federal habeas corpus proceeding. Pennsylvania v. Finley, 481 U.S. 551, 555 (1987); Bonin v. Vasquez, 999 F.2d 425, 428 (9th Cir. 1993). The decision to appoint counsel is generally discretionary. Chaney v. Lewis, 801 F.2d 1191, 1196 (9th Cir. 1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1023 (1987); Bashor v. Risley, 730 F.2d 1228, 1234 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 838 (1984). However, counsel must be appointed if the complexities of the case are such that denial of counsel would amount to a denial of due process, and where the petitioner is a person of such limited education as to be incapable of fairly presenting his claims. See Chaney, 801 F.2d at 1196; see also Hawkins v. Bennett, 423 F.2d 948 (8th Cir. 1970). Here, it appears that the claims are somewhat complex. Additionally, petitioner alleges that he has been diagnosed with several psychological disorders, including long-term and short-term memory deficiencies, and he is serving four consecutive life sentences without the possibility of parole. Accordingly, petitioner's motion for appointment of counsel is granted.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the clerk DETACH and FILE the petition (ECF #1-1.)

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner's motion for appointment of counsel (ECF #2) is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Federal Public Defender for the District of Nevada ("FPD") is appointed to represent petitioner.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall ELECTRONICALLY SERVE the FPD a copy of this order, together with a copy of the petition for writ of habeas corpus (ECF #1-1). The FPD shall have thirty (30) days from the date of entry of this order to file a notice of appearance or to indicate to the court its inability to represent petitioner in these proceedings.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, after counsel has appeared for petitioner in this case, the court will issue a scheduling order, which will, among other things, set a deadline for the filing of a first amended petition.

_____________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Goodman v. Neven

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Mar 15, 2013
2:12-CV-01967-JCM-VCF (D. Nev. Mar. 15, 2013)
Case details for

Goodman v. Neven

Case Details

Full title:RALPH EUGENE GOODMAN, Petitioner, v. D.W. NEVEN, et al., Respondents.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Mar 15, 2013

Citations

2:12-CV-01967-JCM-VCF (D. Nev. Mar. 15, 2013)