Opinion
23-1292
02-26-2024
MERCEDA D. GOODING, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SYKES ENTERPRISE, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee.
Merceda D. Gooding, Appellant Pro Se. Anessa Abrams, FORDHARRISON LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
UNPUBLISHED
Submitted: February 22, 2024
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Paula Xinis, District Judge. (8:20-cv-03292-PX)
Merceda D. Gooding, Appellant Pro Se.
Anessa Abrams, FORDHARRISON LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM.
Merceda D. Gooding appeals the district court's judgment denying relief on her discrimination claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's judgment. Gooding v. Sykes Enter., Inc., No. 8:20-cv-03292-PX (D. Md. Feb. 15, 2023). We deny Gooding's motion for a transcript at government expense and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.