From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gooden v. State

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Feb 20, 2019
No. 05-18-00722-CR (Tex. App. Feb. 20, 2019)

Opinion

No. 05-18-00722-CR

02-20-2019

MELVIN BERNARD GOODEN, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee


On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 2 Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. F17-70898-I

ORDER

We REINSTATE this appeal.

We abated the appeal for the trial court to appoint new counsel. On February 20, 2019, we received the trial court's order appointing counsel. We DIRECT the Clerk to list John Tatum as appointed counsel for appellant. Future correspondence shall be sent to John Tatum at The Summit, 2150 S. Central Expressway, Suite 200, McKinney, TX 75070.

We DENY appellant's February 19, 2019 pro se motion for an evidentiary hearing to determine whether he received the effective assistance of counsel "during the period for filing a motion for new trial." See Miniel v. State, 831 S.W.2d 310, 313 n.1 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992) (appellant not entitled to hybrid representation by both counsel and himself pro se).

Counsel has thirty days in which to determine and, if necessary, file any supplemental or amended briefing. After thirty days, the case will be at issue and will be set for submission in due course.

/s/ CORY L. CARLYLE

JUSTICE


Summaries of

Gooden v. State

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Feb 20, 2019
No. 05-18-00722-CR (Tex. App. Feb. 20, 2019)
Case details for

Gooden v. State

Case Details

Full title:MELVIN BERNARD GOODEN, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

Date published: Feb 20, 2019

Citations

No. 05-18-00722-CR (Tex. App. Feb. 20, 2019)