From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Goode v. Halderman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION
Jan 19, 2012
Case No. 3:11-cv-01461-BR (D. Or. Jan. 19, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 3:11-cv-01461-BR

01-19-2012

YVONNE JOE GOODE, and CHARLES MARVIN GOODE, Plaintiffs, v. RUTH HALDERMAN, and DELORIS MEDERIOS, Defendants.


ORDER

BROWN, Judge.

Plaintiff's bring this civil action pro se. On December 9, 2011, this Court issued an Order dismissing Plaintiff's Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). The Order advised Plaintiffs of the deficiencies of the Complaint and granted them leave to file an amended complaint within 30 days curing those deficiencies. Plaintiffs were advised that failure to file an amended complaint within the time provided would result in the dismissal of this action.

Plaintiffs did not file an amended complaint within the time provided. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED. Because the dismissal of Plaintiff's Complaint was based upon substantive deficiencies which Plaintiff did not cure, the dismissal is WITH PREJUDICE.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_______________

ANNA J. BROWN

United States District Judge
F:\Share\Brown-LawClerks\11-1461goode0110order.wpd


Summaries of

Goode v. Halderman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION
Jan 19, 2012
Case No. 3:11-cv-01461-BR (D. Or. Jan. 19, 2012)
Case details for

Goode v. Halderman

Case Details

Full title:YVONNE JOE GOODE, and CHARLES MARVIN GOODE, Plaintiffs, v. RUTH HALDERMAN…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

Date published: Jan 19, 2012

Citations

Case No. 3:11-cv-01461-BR (D. Or. Jan. 19, 2012)