From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gonzalez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Mar 30, 2005
897 So. 2d 551 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

Opinion

No. 3D05-138.

March 30, 2005.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Mary Barzee, Judge.

Jesus Gonzalez, in proper person.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, for appellee.

Before COPE, RAMIREZ, CORTINAS, JJ.


We affirm the denial of the defendant's motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) finding that his claim for vindictive sentencing cannot be raised in a motion to correct illegal sentence. Wright v. State, 891 So.2d 618 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005); Boyd v. State, 880 So.2d 726 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004). We also certify direct conflict with Johnson v. State, 877 So.2d 795 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004).

Affirmed; direct conflict certified.


Summaries of

Gonzalez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Mar 30, 2005
897 So. 2d 551 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)
Case details for

Gonzalez v. State

Case Details

Full title:Jesus GONZALEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Mar 30, 2005

Citations

897 So. 2d 551 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

Citing Cases

Morales v. State

We have held that a vindictive sentencing claim cannot be brought by a motion to correct illegal sentence…

Martinez v. State

Defendant's vindictive sentencing claim may not be raised in a motion to correct illegal sentence. See…