From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gonzalez v. St. Andre

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Mar 14, 2024
No. 24-CV-00728JST (N.D. Cal. Mar. 14, 2024)

Opinion

24-CV-00728JST

03-14-2024

JOSE A. GONZALEZ, Petitioner, v. ROB ST. ANDRE, Warden Respondent.


ORDER OF TRANSFER

JON S. TIGAR, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

Petitioner, an inmate housed at High Desert State Prison, in Susanville, California has filed this pro se action seeking a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, challenging his conviction for first-degree murder and intentional discharge of a firearm causing great bodily injury or death. See generally ECF No. 1. Petitioner's conviction was obtained in Solano County and he is incarcerated in Lassen County, both of which lie within the Eastern District of California. Venue for a habeas action is proper in either the district of confinement or the district of conviction. 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d). A petition challenging a conviction or the sentence imposed is preferably heard in the district of conviction. See N.D. Cal. Habeas L.R. 2254-3(b); see also Dannenberg v. Ingle, 831 F.Supp. 767, 768 (N.D. Cal. 1993). Here, Petitioner was convicted and sentenced, and is currently confined, in the Eastern District of California. See 28 U.S.C. § 84(b). Accordingly, this case is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. See 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a). The Clerk is directed to close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Gonzalez v. St. Andre

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Mar 14, 2024
No. 24-CV-00728JST (N.D. Cal. Mar. 14, 2024)
Case details for

Gonzalez v. St. Andre

Case Details

Full title:JOSE A. GONZALEZ, Petitioner, v. ROB ST. ANDRE, Warden Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Mar 14, 2024

Citations

No. 24-CV-00728JST (N.D. Cal. Mar. 14, 2024)