From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gonzalez v. Randel

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
Apr 29, 2015
NO. 03-15-00205-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 29, 2015)

Opinion

NO. 03-15-00205-CV

04-29-2015

Carlos A. Gonzalez, Appellant v. Brooke Randel, Appellee


FROM THE COUNTY COURT OF LAW NO. 2 OF TRAVIS COUNTY
NO. C-1-CV-13-010603, HONORABLE TODD T. WONG, JUDGE PRESIDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant filed a notice of appeal on April 3, 2015, of an order granting a court reporter's objections, motion to quash, and motion for protective order concerning a subpoena that was served on the court reporter by appellant. The subpoena purports to require the court reporter to release audiotapes of a pre-trial hearing in an unrelated case.

On April 13, 2015, the Clerk of this Court requested a response from appellant by April 23, 2015. The Clerk advised appellant that he must inform this Court of the basis on which jurisdiction exists or that this Court would dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a). Appellant filed a response, but he failed to show how this Court has appellate jurisdiction over this appeal. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code §§ 51.012 (addressing appeals from final judgments), .014 (addressing appeals of interlocutory orders); Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 200 (Tex. 2001) (noting that generally appeal may be taken only from final judgments). Thus, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a).

/s/_________

Melissa Goodwin, Justice
Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Goodwin and Field Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction Filed: April 29, 2015


Summaries of

Gonzalez v. Randel

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
Apr 29, 2015
NO. 03-15-00205-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 29, 2015)
Case details for

Gonzalez v. Randel

Case Details

Full title:Carlos A. Gonzalez, Appellant v. Brooke Randel, Appellee

Court:TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

Date published: Apr 29, 2015

Citations

NO. 03-15-00205-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 29, 2015)

Citing Cases

Shanks v. Wair

Because the Texas Legislature has not specified that interlocutory discovery orders are immediately…

In re Valenzuela

An order granting a motion to compel discovery is an interlocutory order that is not appealable until after a…