From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gonzalez v. Kernan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 3, 2018
No. 2:17-cv-2340 JAM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 3, 2018)

Opinion

No. 2:17-cv-2340 JAM CKD P

01-03-2018

ALEJANDRO GONZALEZ, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT KERNAN, et al., Defendants.


FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

On November 20, 2017, plaintiff's complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified ///// ///// ///// time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). Dated: January 3, 2018

/s/_________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 1
gonz2340.fta


Summaries of

Gonzalez v. Kernan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 3, 2018
No. 2:17-cv-2340 JAM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 3, 2018)
Case details for

Gonzalez v. Kernan

Case Details

Full title:ALEJANDRO GONZALEZ, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT KERNAN, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 3, 2018

Citations

No. 2:17-cv-2340 JAM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 3, 2018)