From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gonzalez-Flores v. Holder

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
May 13, 2014
575 F. App'x 732 (9th Cir. 2014)

Opinion

No. 11-73158 Agency No. A200-000-631

05-13-2014

JUAN ALBERTO GONZALEZ-FLORES, Petitioner, v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION


MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Before: CLIFTON, BEA, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.

Juan Alberto Gonzalez-Flores, a native and citizen of Nicaragua, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge's ("IJ") decision denying his application for asylum and withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency's factual findings. Santos-Lemus v. Mukasey, 542 F.3d 738, 742 (9th Cir. 2008). We deny in part and grant in part the petition for review, and we remand.

The record does not compel the conclusion that Gonzalez-Flores established changed or extraordinary circumstances sufficient to excuse his untimely filed asylum application. See 8 C.F.R. §§ 1208.4(a)(4), (5). Accordingly, we deny the petition as to his asylum claim.

In denying Gonzalez-Flores's withholding of removal claim, the BIA found Gonzalez-Flores failed to establish past persecution or a fear of future persecution on account of a protected ground. When the IJ and BIA issued their decisions in this case they did not have the benefit of either this court's decisions in Henriquez-Rivas v. Holder, 707 F.3d 1081 (9th Cir. 2013) (en banc), and Cordoba v. Holder, 726 F.3d 1106 (9th Cir. 2013), or the BIA's decisions in Matter of M-E-V-G-, 26 I. & N. Dec. 227 (BIA 2014), and Matter of W-G-R-, 26 I. & N. Dec. 208 (BIA 2014). Thus, we grant the petition as to Gonzalez-Flores's withholding of removal claim, and remand to the agency to determine the impact, if any, of these decisions. See INS v. Ventura, 537 U.S. 12, 16-18 (2002) (per curiam).

The parties shall bear their own costs for this petition for review.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; GRANTED in part; REMANDED.


Summaries of

Gonzalez-Flores v. Holder

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
May 13, 2014
575 F. App'x 732 (9th Cir. 2014)
Case details for

Gonzalez-Flores v. Holder

Case Details

Full title:JUAN ALBERTO GONZALEZ-FLORES, Petitioner, v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: May 13, 2014

Citations

575 F. App'x 732 (9th Cir. 2014)

Citing Cases

Aguilar-Aguilar v. Lynch

In all twelve of these cases—and unlike in Aguilar-Aguilar's case—the BIA had issued a decision before either…