From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gonzalez-Aguilera v. Coursey

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Aug 20, 2012
2:12-cv-00687-TC (D. Or. Aug. 20, 2012)

Opinion

2:12-cv-00687-TC

08-20-2012

C. MICHAEL GONZALEZ-AGUILERA, Petitioner, v. RICK COURSEY, Respondent


ORDER

Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Coffin filed Findings and Recommendation on July 5, 2012, in the above entitled case. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). When either party objects to any portion of a magistrate judge's Findings and Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the magistrate judge's report. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business Machines, Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 920 (1982).

Petitioner has timely filed objections. I have, therefore, given de novo review of Magistrate Judge Coffin's rulings.

I find no error. Accordingly, I ADOPT Magistrate Judge Coffin's Findings and Recommendation filed July 5, 2012, in its entirety. Respondent's motion to dismiss (#8) is allowed. Petitioner's petition (#1) is denied without prejudice. This proceeding is dismissed. The clerk of court is directed to enter judgment accordingly.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

________________________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Gonzalez-Aguilera v. Coursey

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Aug 20, 2012
2:12-cv-00687-TC (D. Or. Aug. 20, 2012)
Case details for

Gonzalez-Aguilera v. Coursey

Case Details

Full title:C. MICHAEL GONZALEZ-AGUILERA, Petitioner, v. RICK COURSEY, Respondent

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Aug 20, 2012

Citations

2:12-cv-00687-TC (D. Or. Aug. 20, 2012)