From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gonzales v. People

United States District Court, Central District of California
Nov 21, 2022
2:22-cv-05828-SB-KS (C.D. Cal. Nov. 21, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-cv-05828-SB-KS

11-21-2022

JAMES ANTHONY GONZALES, Petitioner, v. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

STANLEY BLUMENFELD, JR., UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (“Petition”), all of the records herein, the Amended Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”), and Petitioner's Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Original Report and Recommendation (“Objections”). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b), the Court has conducted a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which objections have been stated. Having completed its review, the Court accepts the findings and recommendations set forth in the Report.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: (1) Petitioner's request for a stay of this action is DENIED for the failure to satisfy the criteria set forth in Rhines v. Weber, 544 U.S. 269 (2005); and (2) Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action without prejudice because it is wholly unexhausted.


Summaries of

Gonzales v. People

United States District Court, Central District of California
Nov 21, 2022
2:22-cv-05828-SB-KS (C.D. Cal. Nov. 21, 2022)
Case details for

Gonzales v. People

Case Details

Full title:JAMES ANTHONY GONZALES, Petitioner, v. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF…

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Nov 21, 2022

Citations

2:22-cv-05828-SB-KS (C.D. Cal. Nov. 21, 2022)