From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gonzales v. Moore

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Nov 28, 2007
Case No. 3:06CV3021 (N.D. Ohio Nov. 28, 2007)

Opinion

Case No. 3:06CV3021.

November 28, 2007


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER


On May 31, 2007 this Court granted petitioner a stay of this action to permit him to exhaust the state remedy of seeking leave to file a delayed direct appeal. That (badly worded) order provided that petitioner was to notify this Court of the ruling upon such a motion within thirty days of a determination by the state court.

To date this Court has heard nothing further. Considering that nearly six months have passed since the stay was entered this Court would normally expect that the state appellate court would have passed upon (and in all probability denied) a motion for leave to file a delayed appeal.

This being so, petitioner is directed to notify this Court within twenty days of entry of this Order as to the status of any state court proceeding he initiated. In the event that he fails to do so this Court will dissolve the stay and restore the action to active status.

IT IS SO ORDERED


Summaries of

Gonzales v. Moore

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Nov 28, 2007
Case No. 3:06CV3021 (N.D. Ohio Nov. 28, 2007)
Case details for

Gonzales v. Moore

Case Details

Full title:Christopher R. Gonzales, Petitioner v. Ernie Moore, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Nov 28, 2007

Citations

Case No. 3:06CV3021 (N.D. Ohio Nov. 28, 2007)