From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

GONINAN v. COX

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Nov 15, 2010
Civil No. 09-728-TC (D. Or. Nov. 15, 2010)

Opinion

Civil No. 09-728-TC.

November 15, 2010


ORDER


Magistrate Judge Coffin filed his Findings and Recommendation on October 19, 2010. The matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). No objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual findings de novo review. Lorin Corp. v. Goto Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 1982). See also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, I adopt Judge Coffin's Findings and Recommendation.

Dated this 12 day of November, 2010.


Summaries of

GONINAN v. COX

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Nov 15, 2010
Civil No. 09-728-TC (D. Or. Nov. 15, 2010)
Case details for

GONINAN v. COX

Case Details

Full title:NATHAN R. GONINAN, Plaintiff, v. LT. DOUG COX, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, D. Oregon

Date published: Nov 15, 2010

Citations

Civil No. 09-728-TC (D. Or. Nov. 15, 2010)