From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gomm v. We Collect, Inc.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Mar 18, 2024
LA CV24-00260 JAK (AJRx) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 18, 2024)

Opinion

LA CV24-00260 JAK (AJRx)

03-18-2024

Russell Gomm, et al. v. We Collect, Inc.

T. Jackson


T. Jackson

PRESENT: THE HONORABLE JOHN A. KRONSTADT, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION AS TO WE COLLECT, INC.

The Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff to show cause in writing no later than March 25, 2024 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution regarding overdue responses as to We Collect, Inc. Pursuant to Rule 55 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff shall file an application requesting the entry of default. Plaintiff is advised that the Court will consider the filing of an amended application, which complies with the federal rules, on or before the date upon which the response is due, as a satisfactory response to the Order to Show Cause. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of an appropriate response. No oral argument will be heard unless otherwise ordered by the Court. Failure to respond will result in the dismissal of this matter.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Gomm v. We Collect, Inc.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Mar 18, 2024
LA CV24-00260 JAK (AJRx) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 18, 2024)
Case details for

Gomm v. We Collect, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Russell Gomm, et al. v. We Collect, Inc.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Mar 18, 2024

Citations

LA CV24-00260 JAK (AJRx) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 18, 2024)