Opinion
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS ECF No. 25
ANTHONY W. ISHII, District Judge.
Plaintiff Fred Gomez ("Plaintiff") is a California state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On November 13, 2012, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint. ECF No. 23. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On April 10, 2013, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations which was served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that any objection to the Findings and Recommendations was to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 25. Plaintiff filed an Objection to the Findings and Recommendations on [DATE]. ECF No. 27.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed April 10, 2013, is adopted in full;
2. This action proceeds on Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint against Defendants Swaim, Becerra, Daveiga, and Junious for deliberate indifference to Plaintiff's conditions of confinement in violation of the Eighth Amendment for placing Plaintiff on management cell status for twenty-two days without adequate heating;
3. Plaintiff's claim regarding denial of four meals over twenty-four hours is dismissed with prejudice for failure to state a claim; and
4. Defendants Does are dismissed from this action.
IT IS SO ORDERED.