From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gomez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jul 27, 1993
621 So. 2d 578 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

Opinion

No. 92-2519.

July 27, 1993.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Alan L. Postman, J.

Kaeiser Potolsky, Miami, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Linda S. Katz, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARKDULL and COPE, JJ.


We entirely agree with the trial court and Freeman v. State, 611 So.2d 1260 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992), that no double jeopardy violation is involved in the prosecution of a D.U.I. charge after the defendant's driver's license has been seized, because of the same conduct, by the arresting officer pursuant to section 322.2615, Florida Statutes (1991). See Smith v. City of Gainesville, 93 So.2d 105 (Fla. 1957).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Gomez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jul 27, 1993
621 So. 2d 578 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)
Case details for

Gomez v. State

Case Details

Full title:EYVOR A. GOMEZ, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jul 27, 1993

Citations

621 So. 2d 578 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

Citing Cases

State v. Oliver

By our decision, we join with the majority of states which have considered this issue and held that a DWI…

State v. Murray

As for the second question, we agree with our companion courts that double jeopardy is not violated when a…