Gomez v. State

Full title: PEDRO GOMEZ, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Jun 28, 1996

686 So. 2d 19 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Opinion

No. 94-02171.

June 28, 1996.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for DeSoto County; James S. Parker, Judge.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Kevin Briggs, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Dale E. Tarpley, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Pedro Gomez argues, and the state concedes, that the trial court erred in ordering restitution more than 60 days after entry of the original judgment and sentence, which did not include restitution. We agree. See State v. Sanderson, 625 So.2d 471 (Fla. 1993). Accordingly, the restitution orders are vacated.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and PARKER and FULMER, JJ., concur.