The same is true looking at the case law of this District as a whole: sometimes courts grant motions to preclude victim contact, and sometimes they deny them. Compare, e.g., Gomez v. Shinn, 587 F. Supp. 3d 939, 945-48 (D. Ariz. 2022), and Reeves v. Shinn, No. CV-21-1183-PHX-DWL, 2021 WL 5771151, at *4-6 (D. Ariz. Dec. 6, 2021), with Miller v. Shinn, No. CV-21-00992-PHX-ROS, 2021 WL 4503461, at *1-4 (D. Ariz. Oct. 1, 2021), and Armstrong v. Ryan, No. CV-15-00358-TUC-RM, 2019 WL 1254653, at *2 (D. Ariz. Mar. 19, 2019). Thus, there is no persuasive consensus as to whether the Statute is necessary or even helpful to protecting victims' rights under the Arizona Constitution beyond those provided under the federal Crime Victims' Rights Act, 28 U.S.C. § 3771(a), including "[t]he right to be treated with fairness and respect for the victim's dignity and privacy."