From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gomez v. Perryman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Mar 12, 2018
Civ. No. 9:14-CV-1476 (TJM/DJS) (N.D.N.Y. Mar. 12, 2018)

Opinion

Civ. No. 9:14-CV-1476 (TJM/DJS)

03-12-2018

SANTIAGO GOMEZ, Plaintiff, v. D. PERRYMAN and PAUL WOODRUFF, Defendants.


THOMAS J. McAVOY, Senior United States District Judge

DECISION & ORDER

I. INTRODUCTION

This pro se action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 was referred to the Hon. Daniel J. Stewart, United States Magistrate Judge, for a Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Rule 72.3(c). No objections to Magistrate Judge Stewart's February 16, 2018 Report-Recommendation and Order [dkt. # 83] have been filed, and the time to do so has expired.

II. DISCUSSION

After examining the record, this Court has determined that the Report-Recommendation and Order is not subject to attack for plain error or manifest injustice.

III. CONCLUSION

Accordingly, the Court ACCEPTS the Report-Recommendation and Order [dkt. # 83] for the reasons stated therein. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment [dkt. # 69] is GRANTED and the action is DISMISSED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 12, 2018

/s/_________

Thomas J. McAvoy

Senior, U.S. District Judge


Summaries of

Gomez v. Perryman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Mar 12, 2018
Civ. No. 9:14-CV-1476 (TJM/DJS) (N.D.N.Y. Mar. 12, 2018)
Case details for

Gomez v. Perryman

Case Details

Full title:SANTIAGO GOMEZ, Plaintiff, v. D. PERRYMAN and PAUL WOODRUFF, Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Mar 12, 2018

Citations

Civ. No. 9:14-CV-1476 (TJM/DJS) (N.D.N.Y. Mar. 12, 2018)