From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gomez v. Marta

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Dec 3, 1991
413 S.E.2d 747 (Ga. Ct. App. 1991)

Opinion

A90A0960.

DECIDED DECEMBER 3, 1991.

Inverse condemnation. Fulton Superior Court. Before Judge Johnson.

McKenney Froelich, William J. McKenney, David M. Kupsky for appellants.

Pursley, Howell, Lowery Meeks, Charles N. Pursley, Jr., Neely Player, John T. Ruff, for appellees.


Our reversal of the trial court's grant of MARTA's motion for directed verdict having been reversed by the Supreme Court in MARTA v. Gomez, 261 Ga. 617 ( 409 S.E.2d 35) (1991), our decision in Gomez v. MARTA, 197 Ga. App. 834 ( 399 S.E.2d 536) (1990), is hereby vacated and the judgment of the Supreme Court is made the judgment of this Court. The grant of MARTA's motion for directed verdict is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed. Sognier, C. J., McMurray, P. J., Birdsong, P. J., Carley, P. J., Pope, Cooper and Andrews, JJ., and Judge Arnold Shulman concur.

DECIDED DECEMBER 3, 1991.


Summaries of

Gomez v. Marta

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Dec 3, 1991
413 S.E.2d 747 (Ga. Ct. App. 1991)
Case details for

Gomez v. Marta

Case Details

Full title:GOMEZ et al. v. MARTA et al

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Dec 3, 1991

Citations

413 S.E.2d 747 (Ga. Ct. App. 1991)
413 S.E.2d 747