From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gomez v. Inovision-Medclr Portfolio Grp., Llc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Aug 18, 2014
13 Civ. 7395 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 18, 2014)

Opinion

13 Civ. 7395

08-18-2014

CARMEN GOMEZ, Plaintiff, v. INOVISION-MEDCLR PORTFOLIO GROUP, LLC., PETER T. ROACH & ASSOCIATES, P.C., KIRSCHENBAUM, PHILLIPS & ROACH, P.C. TIMOTHY MURTHA, LVNV FUNDING, LLC, RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES, LP, and NCO FINANCIAL SYSTEMS, INC., Defendants.

APPEARANCES: Attorney for the Plaintiff THE LAW OF AHMAD KESHAVARZ 16 Court St., 26th Floor Brooklyn, NY 11241 By Ahmad Keshavarz, Esq. Attorneys for Defendants LVNV Funding, LLC and Resurgent Capital Services, LP HINSHAW & CULBERTSON LLP 800 Third Avenue, 13th Floor New York, NY 10022 By: Han Sheng Beh, Esq. Concepcion A. Montoya, Esq.


OPINION

APPEARANCES:

Attorney for the Plaintiff

THE LAW OF AHMAD KESHAVARZ

16 Court St., 26th Floor

Brooklyn, NY 11241

By Ahmad Keshavarz, Esq.

Attorneys for Defendants LVNV Funding, LLC and

Resurgent Capital Services, LP

HINSHAW & CULBERTSON LLP

800 Third Avenue, 13th Floor

New York, NY 10022

By: Han Sheng Beh, Esq.

Concepcion A. Montoya, Esq.

Sweet, D.J.

Plaintiff Carmen Gomez ("Gomez" or the "Plaintiff") has moved pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 36(a) (6) and 37 (a) to compel defendants Inovision-Medclr Portfolio Group, LLC, Peter T. Roach & Associates, P.C. ("PC"), Kirschenbaum, Phillips & Roach, P.C. ("KPR"), Timothy Murtha ("Murtha"), LVNV Funding, LLC, Resurgent Capital Services, LP, and NCO Financial Systems, Inc. (collectively the "Defendants"), to produce documents and answers to interrogatories. The motion is granted as set forth below. Prior Proceedings

Gomez filed her complaint on October 18, 2013 alleging violations by Defendants of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, 47 U.S.C. § 227, et seq. , and New York General Business Law Section 349 et seq., and violations by PC, KPR and Murtha of New York Judiciary Law § 487 et seq. (Compl. ¶¶ 56 - 87.)

The instant motion was submitted on July 9, 2014. The Motion Is Granted As Set Forth Below

The Defendants will produce any collection agreements between them.

Defendants will identify individuals referred to in collection notes.

Defendants will produce any Chase Manhattan documents relating to the debt at issue and any document relating to any notice of assignment.

It is so ordered. Dated: New York, New York

August 18, 2014

/s/_________

Robert W. Sweet, U.S.D.J.


Summaries of

Gomez v. Inovision-Medclr Portfolio Grp., Llc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Aug 18, 2014
13 Civ. 7395 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 18, 2014)
Case details for

Gomez v. Inovision-Medclr Portfolio Grp., Llc.

Case Details

Full title:CARMEN GOMEZ, Plaintiff, v. INOVISION-MEDCLR PORTFOLIO GROUP, LLC., PETER…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Aug 18, 2014

Citations

13 Civ. 7395 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 18, 2014)