From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gomez v. Dresser

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Feb 9, 2024
23-cv-06307-BLF (N.D. Cal. Feb. 9, 2024)

Opinion

23-cv-06307-BLF

02-09-2024

MICHELLE GOMEZ, Plaintiff, v. WILLIAM CHARLES DRESSER, Defendant.


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED

BETH LAB SON FREEMAN, United States District Judge

On January 18, 2024, the Court granted Defendant's motion for a more definite statement and ordered Plaintiff to file an amended complaint no later than February 8, 2024. ECF No. 11. Plaintiff has filed to file any amended complaint. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS Plaintiff to show cause, in writing and no later than March 1, 2024, why the deficient compliant should not be stricken and why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Gomez v. Dresser

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Feb 9, 2024
23-cv-06307-BLF (N.D. Cal. Feb. 9, 2024)
Case details for

Gomez v. Dresser

Case Details

Full title:MICHELLE GOMEZ, Plaintiff, v. WILLIAM CHARLES DRESSER, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Feb 9, 2024

Citations

23-cv-06307-BLF (N.D. Cal. Feb. 9, 2024)