Opinion
2:21-cv-03708
06-06-2022
Rachelle Gomez in her individual capacity and as successor in interest for Decedent Gael Martinez Plaintiffs, v. County of Los Angeles, a public entity; Candice Brown an individual; Doris' Lemieux, an individual; Eboni Crowe, an individual; Adrian Hawkins, an individual; County DOE Workers 1-10, unidentified named individuals; The City of Beverly Hills, a public entity Officer DOE Lovell, an unidentified individual; Officer U. Mendoza, an individual; Police Officer DOES 1-10 Humanistic Foundation, Inc., a California corporation; Group Home DOE Employees 1-10, unidentified known individuals; Defendants.
Complaint Filed: April 30, 2021
JUDGMENT GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
HON. GARY KLAUSNER UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD:
Whereas Defendants COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CANDICE BROWN, DORIS LEMIEUX, EBONI CROWE, AND ADRIAN HAWKINS filed a Motion for Summary Judgment and/or Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, and Defendant MENDOZA filed a Motion for Summary Judgment, on all remaining claims alleged in Plaintiff RACHELLE GOMEZ's Second Amended Complaint filed on October 18, 2022;
Whereas the aforementioned Motions were taken under submission by the Honorable R. Gary Klausner, United States District Court Judge presiding;
Whereas, the Court having read and considered the papers submitted in support of the Motions, and based upon the papers and pleadings on file in this matter;
GOOD CAUSE HAVING BEEN FOUND, the Court hereby orders that Defendants MENDOZA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, ADRIAN HAWKINS, EBONI CROWE, DORIS LEMIEUX, AND CANDICE BROWN have judgment entered in their favor forthwith, that Plaintiff RACHELLE GOMEZ take nothing, and that the action be dismissed on the merits. It is further ordered and adjudged that Defendants recover their costs.
IT IS SO ORDERED.