From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gomez v. City of Victorville City Council

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jan 12, 2022
EDCV 20-2626 JGB (KKx) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 12, 2022)

Opinion

EDCV 20-2626 JGB (KKx)

01-12-2022

Blanca Gomez v. City of Victorville City Council, et al.


Present: The Honorable JESUS G. BERNAL, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CIVIL MINUTES-GENERAL

Proceedings: Order to Show Cause for Failure to Prosecute (IN CHAMBERS)

Absent a showing of good cause, an action must be dismissed without prejudice if the summons and complaint are not served on a defendant within 90 days after the complaint is filed. Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m). Generally, defendants must answer the complaint within 21 days after service (60 days if the defendant is the United States). Fed R. Civ. P. 12(a)(1).

In the present case, it appears that one or more of these time periods has not been met. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff Blanca Gomez to show cause in writing on or before January 18, 2022, why this action should not be dismissed as to the applicable defendants for lack of prosecution. Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court finds that this matter is appropriate for submission without oral argument. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of a responsive pleading or motion on or before the date upon which a response by the Plaintiff is due.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Gomez v. City of Victorville City Council

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jan 12, 2022
EDCV 20-2626 JGB (KKx) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 12, 2022)
Case details for

Gomez v. City of Victorville City Council

Case Details

Full title:Blanca Gomez v. City of Victorville City Council, et al.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Jan 12, 2022

Citations

EDCV 20-2626 JGB (KKx) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 12, 2022)