Opinion
No. 06-70244.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).
Filed June 11, 2007.
Hugo Gomez-Dominguez, La Habra, CA, pro se.
CAC-District Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Kurt B. Larson, Esq., P. Michael Truman, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Agency No. A78-019-499.
Before: LEAVY, RYMER, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Hugo Gomez-Dominguez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' adoption and affirmance of an immigration judge's denial of his application for cancellation of removal. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We dismiss the petition for review.
We lack jurisdiction to review the agency's discretionary hardship determination as well as petitioner's non-colorable claim that the agency deprived him of due process by failing to consider adequately the hardship his son would face if he is deported. Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir. 2005).