From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gomez-Alamanza v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
May 13, 2013
CRIM. ACTION NO. 10-CR-67 (E.D. Pa. May. 13, 2013)

Opinion

CRIM. ACTION NO. 10-CR-67 CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-CV-7114

05-13-2013

ISRAEL GOMEZ-ALAMANZA, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.


ORDER

AND NOW, this 13th day of May, 2013, after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Lynne A. Sitarski dated April 24, 2013, and any objections filed thereto, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED.
2. Petitioner's Pro Se Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence filed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Doc. No. 27) is DENIED.

BY THE COURT:

_________________

C. DARNELL JONES, II, J.


Summaries of

Gomez-Alamanza v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
May 13, 2013
CRIM. ACTION NO. 10-CR-67 (E.D. Pa. May. 13, 2013)
Case details for

Gomez-Alamanza v. United States

Case Details

Full title:ISRAEL GOMEZ-ALAMANZA, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: May 13, 2013

Citations

CRIM. ACTION NO. 10-CR-67 (E.D. Pa. May. 13, 2013)

Citing Cases

Charles v. Warren

As stated many times by the PCR court and Appellate Division, counsel cannot be found to be ineffective for…