From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Golliher v. Suburban MFG

United States District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee
Mar 14, 2023
1:22-cv-255 (E.D. Tenn. Mar. 14, 2023)

Opinion

1:22-cv-255

03-14-2023

JENNIFER D. GOLLIHER, Plaintiff, v. SUBURBAN MFG, et al., Defendants.


Magistrate Judge Lee

ORDER

UCHARLES E. ATCHLEY, JR.NITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

United States Magistrate Judge Susan K. Lee filed a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) [Doc. 9] pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and the Rules of this Court. Previously, Judge Lee granted Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis but ordered Plaintiff to file an Amended Complaint. [Doc. 7]. Plaintiff filed the Amended Complaint [Doc. 8], and Judge Lee has now issued an R&R screening this action. [Doc. 9]; see 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2).

Plaintiff has not filed an objection to the Report and Recommendation. The Court has nonetheless reviewed the R&R [Id.], as well as the record, and agrees with Judge Lee's conclusions.

Magistrate Judge Lee advised that the parties had fourteen days in which to object to the Report and Recommendation and that failure to do so would waive any right to appeal. [Doc. 9 at 10 n.3); see Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b)(2); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 148-51 (1985) (“It does not appear that Congress intended to require district court review of a magistrate judge's factual or legal conclusions, under a de novo or any other standard, when neither party objects to those findings.”).

Accordingly, the Court ACCEPTS and ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Lee's findings of fact and conclusions of law as set forth in the R&R [Doc. 9]. Accordingly:

(1) Plaintiff's Title VII claim against Suburban Manufacturing for hostile work environment based on racial harassment SHALL PROCEED;
(2) all remaining claims, including any Title VII claims Plaintiff asserted against the individual defendants McMillon, Amos, and Thomas, and any Title VII discrimination claims are hereby DISMISSED;
(3) former named Defendant Customer Driven Staffing is hereby TERMINATED and any pending claims against that entity are hereby DISMISSED;
(4) The Clerk is DIRECTED to issue process for service of the Amended Complaint.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Golliher v. Suburban MFG

United States District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee
Mar 14, 2023
1:22-cv-255 (E.D. Tenn. Mar. 14, 2023)
Case details for

Golliher v. Suburban MFG

Case Details

Full title:JENNIFER D. GOLLIHER, Plaintiff, v. SUBURBAN MFG, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee

Date published: Mar 14, 2023

Citations

1:22-cv-255 (E.D. Tenn. Mar. 14, 2023)