From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Golet v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Sep 29, 2009
294 S.W.3d 88 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009)

Opinion

No. ED91880.

September 29, 2009.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Charles County, Nancy L. Schneider, Judge.

Edward S. Thompson, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.

Chris Koster, Attorney General, Jamie P. Rasmussen, Asst. Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.

Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J. and ROBERT G. DOWD, JR. and PATRICIA L. COHEN, JJ.

Prior report: 181 S.W.3d 588.



ORDER


Steven Golet ("Movant") appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Movant contends the motion court clearly erred in denying his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing because (1) he pleaded facts showing his appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to raise an error on appeal by not filing a complete record on appeal, and (2) he pleaded facts showing his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to particularize the prejudice to Movant in a motion to sever.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. The motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Golet v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Sep 29, 2009
294 S.W.3d 88 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009)
Case details for

Golet v. State

Case Details

Full title:Steven GOLET, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District

Date published: Sep 29, 2009

Citations

294 S.W.3d 88 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009)