From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Goldstine v. FedEx Freight Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE
Dec 29, 2020
CASE NO. C18-1164 MJP (W.D. Wash. Dec. 29, 2020)

Opinion

CASE NO. C18-1164 MJP

12-29-2020

DAVID GOLDSTINE, Plaintiff, v. FEDEX FREIGHT INC, Defendant.


ORDER REQUESTING PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

The Court raises this matter sua sponte. The jury rendered an advisory verdict on Plaintiff's ADA retaliation claim. But pursuant to Rule 52(a)(1), the Court must enter findings of fact and conclusions of law on Plaintiff's ADA retaliation claim. To facilitate the Court's efforts, the Court requests the Parties submit proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law as to this claim by no later than January 8, 2021. \\ \\ \\

The clerk is ordered to provide copies of this order to all counsel.

Dated December 29, 2020.

/s/_________

Marsha J. Pechman

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Goldstine v. FedEx Freight Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE
Dec 29, 2020
CASE NO. C18-1164 MJP (W.D. Wash. Dec. 29, 2020)
Case details for

Goldstine v. FedEx Freight Inc.

Case Details

Full title:DAVID GOLDSTINE, Plaintiff, v. FEDEX FREIGHT INC, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

Date published: Dec 29, 2020

Citations

CASE NO. C18-1164 MJP (W.D. Wash. Dec. 29, 2020)