From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Goldstein v. Stone

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jul 22, 1957
96 So. 2d 227 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1957)

Opinion

No. 57-5.

July 22, 1957.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, Marshall C. Wiseheart, J.

H. Irwin Levy, West Palm Beach, for appellants.

Patton Kanner, Miami, for appellee.


We have examined the record and the briefs of counsel in this cause and heard oral argument at the bar of this Court. It is apparent to the Court upon perusal of the record that the Chancellor below based his findings upon conflicting evidence. We follow the rule so often enunciated by the Supreme Court of this State that "The findings of a Chancellor based upon conflicting evidence will not be disturbed unless clearly shown to be erroneous." Cobb v. Cobb, 82 Fla. 287, 89 So. 869; Grantham v. Grantham, 140 Fla. 120, 191 So. 197; Peterson v. Hancock, 146 Fla. 410, 1 So.2d 255; Monyak v. Monyak, Fla., 43 So.2d 903; Town of Howey in the Hills v. Graessle, Fla., 57 So.2d 422, and Loew v. Friedman, Fla., 80 So.2d 672. We find no reversible error in the record and therefore conclude that the cause should be, and it is hereby, affirmed.

CARROLL, CHAS., C.J., and HORTON and PEARSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Goldstein v. Stone

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jul 22, 1957
96 So. 2d 227 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1957)
Case details for

Goldstein v. Stone

Case Details

Full title:AL GOLDSTEIN ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. RICHARD B. STONE, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jul 22, 1957

Citations

96 So. 2d 227 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1957)

Citing Cases

May v. Schepis

The first eight cases cited above are analyzed by the court in the case of Boutte v. New Orleans Terminal…

Young v. Eddy

had breached the obligations of the lessor under Article 2692, LSA-Civil Code, to maintain the lessee in…