From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

GOLDSTEIN v. RANDEE ELAINE SPA

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 18, 2011
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 51889 (N.Y. App. Term 2011)

Opinion

570211/11.

Decided October 18, 2011.

Plaintiff appeals from an order of the Small Claims Part of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County (Manuel J. Mendez, J.), dated August 11, 2010, which denied her motion to vacate a judgment of dismissal after a nonjury trial, in an action to recover damages for personal injuries.

PRESENT: Torres, J.P., Shulman, Hunter, Jr., JJ.


Order (Manuel J. Mendez, J.), dated August 11, 2010, affirmed, without costs.

No basis was shown to vacate the (unappealed) judgment in favor of the defendant after trial in this small claim action ( see generally Williams v Roper, 269 AD2d 125, 126; Forte v Bielecki, 118 AD2d 620). To the extent that plaintiff's posttrial motion sought to challenge evidentiary rulings, "alleged errors in the presentation of evidence or pleadings are not reviewable upon this appeal as they are not a basis for reversal of a judgment" ( Blair v Five Points Shopping Plaza, Inc., 51 AD2d 167, 169; see Brooks v Angelo's Cleaners, 103 AD2d 923).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.


Summaries of

GOLDSTEIN v. RANDEE ELAINE SPA

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 18, 2011
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 51889 (N.Y. App. Term 2011)
Case details for

GOLDSTEIN v. RANDEE ELAINE SPA

Case Details

Full title:LAUREN K. GOLDSTEIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. RANDEE ELAINE SPA LASER…

Court:Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 18, 2011

Citations

2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 51889 (N.Y. App. Term 2011)