From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Goldstein v. Bd. of Educ

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 30, 1966
224 N.E.2d 729 (N.Y. 1966)

Opinion

Argued November 22, 1966

Decided December 30, 1966

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, WILLIAM J. SULLIVAN, J.

Alfred W. Gans and Charles F. Krause for appellants.

John M. Downing for respondent.



Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Concur: Judges FULD, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE, SCILEPPI and BERGAN. Chief Judge DESMOND and Judge KEATING dissent and vote to reverse and to grant a new trial upon the ground that there were questions of fact properly submitted to the jury as to infant plaintiff's status as an invitee and his freedom from contributory negligence and as to defendant Suprina's negligence.


Summaries of

Goldstein v. Bd. of Educ

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 30, 1966
224 N.E.2d 729 (N.Y. 1966)
Case details for

Goldstein v. Bd. of Educ

Case Details

Full title:HOWARD A. GOLDSTEIN, by SIDNEY GOLDSTEIN, His Guardian ad Litem, et al.…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Dec 30, 1966

Citations

224 N.E.2d 729 (N.Y. 1966)
224 N.E.2d 729
278 N.Y.S.2d 224

Citing Cases

Nicholson v. Bd. of Educ. of the City of N.Y

No supervision was attempted and no organized play was developed. Under such circumstances, no duty may be…

HIRSCH v. HADE

This was error. Plaintiff, as a social guest, was a licensee and defendant's duty must accord with the…