From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Goldsmith v. Chemical Bank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 19, 2007
41 A.D.3d 648 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)

Opinion

No. 2004-08756.

June 19, 2007.

In an action to recover damages for libel arising out of the wrongful dishonor of checks, the defendant appeals, as limited by its brief, from stated portions of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (LeVine, J.), dated June 28, 2004, which, inter alia, denied those branches of its cross motion which were to dismiss the complaint based on spoliation of evidence or, in the alternative, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and denied, in effect, without prejudice to renewal before the trial court, that branch of its cross motion which was to preclude the plaintiff from calling its expert witness to testify at trial.

Tromello, McDonnell Kehoe, Melville, N.Y. (James S. Kehoe of counsel), for appellant.

Steven R. Haffner, Bayside, N.Y., for respondent.

Before: Prudenti, P.J., Santucci, Covello and Carni, JJ.


Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

The appeal from the order must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of judgment in the action ( see Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241, 248; Goldsmith Motors Corp. v Chemical Bank, 41 AD3d 648).


Summaries of

Goldsmith v. Chemical Bank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 19, 2007
41 A.D.3d 648 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
Case details for

Goldsmith v. Chemical Bank

Case Details

Full title:GOLDSMITH MOTORS CORP., Respondent, v. CHEMICAL BANK, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 19, 2007

Citations

41 A.D.3d 648 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 5464
836 N.Y.S.2d 893