Goldsmith v. Cate

Full title: JAMES K. GOLDSMITH, Plaintiff, v. MATTHEW CATE, et al., Defendants.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Jul 31, 2013

2:13-cv-0943 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 31, 2013)

Opinion

JAMES K. GOLDSMITH, Plaintiff, v. MATTHEW CATE, et al., Defendants. No. 2:13-cv-0943 KJN P United States District Court, E.D. California. July 31, 2013

          ORDER

          KENDALL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge.

         Plaintiff consented to proceed before the undersigned for all purposes. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). By order filed July 3, 2013, plaintiff was ordered to show cause, within fourteen days, why this action should not be dismissed. The fourteen day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not shown cause or otherwise responded to the court's order.

         Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).