From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Goldmann v. The Cnty. of Sherburne

United States District Court, District of Minnesota
Jul 15, 2024
21-cv-2530 (KMM/DJF) (D. Minn. Jul. 15, 2024)

Opinion

21-cv-2530 (KMM/DJF)

07-15-2024

Steven Goldmann et al., Plaintiffs, v. The County of Sherburne, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Katherine M. Menendez, United States District Judge

The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Judge Dulce Foster, dated May 31, 2024. ECF 151. No objections have been filed to that R&R in the permitted time period.

The Court reviews de novo any portion of the R&R to which specific objections are made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D. Minn. LR 72.2(b). In the absence of objections, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. Nur v. Olmsted County, 563 F.Supp.3d 946, 949 (D. Minn. 2021) (citing Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b) and Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam)). Based on the Court's careful review of the R&R and the record in this case, the Magistrate Judge committed no error, clear or otherwise.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF 151] is ACCEPTED.

2. The class action claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE and STRICKEN from the Amended Complaint [ECF 67], including paragraphs 33, 48-60, and 137(A), as well as the characterization of this case as a class action in the caption and paragraphs 1 and 2.


Summaries of

Goldmann v. The Cnty. of Sherburne

United States District Court, District of Minnesota
Jul 15, 2024
21-cv-2530 (KMM/DJF) (D. Minn. Jul. 15, 2024)
Case details for

Goldmann v. The Cnty. of Sherburne

Case Details

Full title:Steven Goldmann et al., Plaintiffs, v. The County of Sherburne, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, District of Minnesota

Date published: Jul 15, 2024

Citations

21-cv-2530 (KMM/DJF) (D. Minn. Jul. 15, 2024)