From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Goldman v. Sontag

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 2, 1941
262 App. Div. 920 (N.Y. App. Div. 1941)

Opinion

July 2, 1941.

Present — Hill, P.J., Bliss, Heffernan, Schenck and Foster, JJ.


Motion granted to substitute in the decision of this court the following: Ordered and adjudged that the judgment appealed from be and the same hereby is in all things reversed on the law and on the facts, with costs and the complaint dismissed. This dismissal is without prejudice to the amendment of the complaint to state a cause of action for damages if plaintiff so desires and is able to amend her complaint to state such cause of action in place and stead of the following paragraph: Ordered and adjudged that the judgment appealed from be and the same hereby is in all things reversed on the law and on the facts, with costs, and a new trial as in an action for damages granted if plaintiff desires and is able to amend her complaint to state such cause of action.


Summaries of

Goldman v. Sontag

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 2, 1941
262 App. Div. 920 (N.Y. App. Div. 1941)
Case details for

Goldman v. Sontag

Case Details

Full title:SADIE GOLDMAN, Appellant, v. ANNA SONTAG and Others, Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jul 2, 1941

Citations

262 App. Div. 920 (N.Y. App. Div. 1941)