From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Goldman v. Rosen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 24, 2005
15 A.D.3d 321 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

5466N.

February 24, 2005.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan A. Madden, J.), entered October 4, 2004, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the brief, denied defendant Rosen's motion to consolidate this action with the summary proceeding pending between the parties in Civil Court, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Before: Mazzarelli, J.P., Sullivan, Ellerin, Nardelli and Williams, JJ., concur.


The motion court properly exercised its discretion in refusing to consolidate this Supreme Court action, which is not yet at the discovery stage, with a pending Civil Court summary proceeding that has already been placed on the trial calendar ( see Barnes v. Cathers Dembrosky, 5 AD3d 122; Abrams v. Port Auth. Trans-Hudson Corp., 1 AD3d 118, 119.


Summaries of

Goldman v. Rosen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 24, 2005
15 A.D.3d 321 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

Goldman v. Rosen

Case Details

Full title:SHARON GOLDMAN, Respondent, v. ABY ROSEN, Appellant, et al., Counterclaim…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 24, 2005

Citations

15 A.D.3d 321 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
789 N.Y.S.2d 879

Citing Cases

Va. Sur. Co. v. Travelers Prop. Cas. Co.

Bender v. Underwood, 93 AD2d 747 (1st Dept 1983). Moreover, when the actions sought to be consolidated are at…

Lofty Apartment Corp. v. R.A.V. Barouck LLC

Therefore, pursuant to the stipulation between plaintiff and the receiver for R. David Ben Barouck Corp.…