From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Golding v. DHS/ICE

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 24, 2021
20-CV-8679 (VSB) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 24, 2021)

Opinion

20-CV-8679 (VSB)

09-24-2021

KARIM GOLDING, Plaintiff, v. DHS/ICE, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

VERNON S. BRODERICK, United States District Judge:

Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se and in forma pauperis. The Court does not have a current address for Plaintiff on file, and Plaintiff has not made any filings in this action since June of this year. (See Doc. 46.) I previously directed Plaintiff to provide a status update to the Court regarding his attempts to find counsel to represent him, and I attempted to send notice to Plaintiff via the address he stated in his last filing. (Doc. 49.) That mailing to Plaintiff was returned as undeliverable and unable to be forwarded, and Plaintiff has failed to contact the Court concerning his case, including by updating his address. Accordingly, it is hereby:

ORDERED that the above-captioned action is dismissed for failure to prosecute without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court's docket if the application to restore the action is made within thirty (30) days.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Golding v. DHS/ICE

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 24, 2021
20-CV-8679 (VSB) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 24, 2021)
Case details for

Golding v. DHS/ICE

Case Details

Full title:KARIM GOLDING, Plaintiff, v. DHS/ICE, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Sep 24, 2021

Citations

20-CV-8679 (VSB) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 24, 2021)